Governance Mechanisms, Managerial’s Commitment Bias and Firm’s Investment Decision Escalation: Failure of Firm’s Crises Communication: Bayesian Network Method
View Abstract View PDF Download PDF

Keywords

Commitment bias, cognitive dissonance, firm’s financial strength, ownership concentration, board independence, remuneration system, escalatory behavior

How to Cite

Fadhila, H., Ali , A. M., & Anis, J. . (2014). Governance Mechanisms, Managerial’s Commitment Bias and Firm’s Investment Decision Escalation: Failure of Firm’s Crises Communication: Bayesian Network Method. Asian Journal of Empirical Research, 4(2), 125–149. Retrieved from https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5004/article/view/3676

Abstract

This paper studies the role of governance mechanisms, CEO’s cognitive characteristics and firms’ financial features in justifying the CEO’s escalatory behavior in firm’s investment decision. This study aims to provide evidence as to whether managers consider the persuasive influence of governance mechanisms and the firm’s financial indicators to persevere his initial investment decision while he notes a high level of commitment bias. The proposed model of this paper uses Bayesian Network Method to examine this relationship. CEO’s cognitive characteristics have been measured by means of a questionnaire comprising several items. As for the selected sample, it has been composed of some 220 Tunisian executives. Our results have revealed the inefficient role of governance mechanisms as a persuasive communication. Managers who note a high commitment level per severe a failed course of action and ignore the governance pressure and the firm financial strength. This article has implications for the development of new referential in building corporate governance system by incorporating the commitment dimension.

View Abstract View PDF Download PDF

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.